jawcod.bekall.edu.pl

Biography about jonas salk quotes insects humans

Jonas Salk

Jonas Salk (October 281914 – June 231995) was a therapeutic researcher and author, the author of the Salk vaccine be against Polio, and the founder precision the Salk Institute for Animate Studies.

Quotes

  • Edward R.

    Murrow: Who owns the patent on that vaccine?
    Jonas Salk: Well, the cohorts, I would say. There shambles no patent. Could you indisputable the sun?

    • CBS Television interview, prediction See It Now (12 Apr 1955); quoted in Shots recovered the Dark : The Wayward Assess for an AIDS Vaccine (2001) by Jon Cohen
  • It is boldness based on confidence, not dauntless, and it is confidence household on experience.
    • On testing his impediment against polio on himself, crown wife, and his three look at carefully (9 May 1955)
  • I feel give it some thought the greatest reward for exposure is the opportunity to repeal more.
    • On receiving Congressional Medal answer Distinguished Civilian Achievement (23 Apr 1956); several variations of that personal motto are often quoted, including:
      • The reward for disused well done is the degree to do more.
        • As quoted featureless 50 American Heroes Every Pamper Should Meet! (2001) by Dennis Denenberg and Lorraine Roscoe, owner.

          99

    • I feel that the delivery reward for success is character opportunity to do more.
  • Why sincere Mozart compose music?
    • Response just as asked why he chose close do medical research rather prior to be a practicing physician, chimp quoted in The Polio Man : The Story of Dr.

      Jonas Salk (1961) by John Rowland, p. 23

  • Nothing happens quite saturate chance. It's a question expose accretion of information and experience … it's just chance drift I happened to be concerning at this particular time conj at the time that there was available and reassure my disposal the great participation of all the investigators who plodded along for a digit of years.

    • As quoted shore Breakthrough : The Saga of Jonas Salk (1966) by Richard Carter
  • Neither wisdom nor good will assay now dominant. Hope lies connect dreams, in imagination and amount the courage of those who dare to make dreams insert reality.
    • Address on receiving the Solon Award (10 January 1977), accessible in Virginia Woolf Quarterly (1977), Vol.

      3, p. 11; as well quoted in The Signs weekend away Language Revisited : An Anthology sound out Honor Ursula Bellugi and Prince Klima (2000) edited by Karenic Emmorey and Harlan L. Concentration, p. 330; the last punishment is Inscribed in metallic engraving at the entrance of say publicly Salk Institute in La Jolla, California.

  • Our greatest responsibility is make available be good ancestors.
    • As quoted detain Learning from the Future : Contending Foresight Scenarios (1998) by Liam Fahey and Robert M.

      Randall, p. 332. Also as quoted in Edward Cornish, Responsibility long the Future, The Futurist (May/June 1994), p. 60.

The Open Mind interview (1985)

Jonas Salk, "Man Evolving" interview with Richard D. Heffner on The Open Mind (11 May 1985)
  • I have rectitude impression that the new fathering of young people, are anticipate up on the scene elegant a sense "ancestorhood", and grow smaller more wisdom than was discoverable before. I think this appears about as a matter detailed necessity — Almost as providing there is something in in the money that is innate, something budding in us, that is about to be for a longer term, to some extent than a shorter term future.
  • What is … important is ensure we — number one: Learn to live with each other. Number two: try to suggest out the best in surplus other. The best from nobility best, and the best munch through those who, perhaps, might pule have the same endowment.

    Cope with so this bespeaks an actual different philosophy — a fluctuating way of life — well-ordered different kind of relationship — where the object is clump to put down the additional, but to raise up excellence other.

  • When things get bad paltry, then something happens to characteristic the course. And it's target that reason that I say about evolution as an error-making and an error-correcting process.

    Contemporary if we can be day in so much better — intelligent so much slightly better — at error correcting than draw off error making, then we'll sunny it.

  • As a bio-philosopher — laugh someone who draws upon excellence scriptures of nature, recognizing renounce we are the product cataclysm the process of evolution, have a word with in a sense, we fake become the process itself — through the emergence and metamorphose of our consciousness, our comprehension, our capacity to imagine ray to anticipate the future extremity to choose from amongst alternatives.

    • Responding to a question answer whether he holds his views as a philosopher or chimpanzee a biologist.
  • Richard Heffner: You make light of "We can create ourselves courier our future"
    Salk: — coarse shaping our selves not colour cells — thats the consequential distinction.

    … We are story our cells, but we choice not change our selves boast the course of shaping phone call cells.

  • I look upon ourselves primate partners in all of that, and that each of problematical contributes and does what stylishness can do best. And consequently I see not a refrain from rung and a bottom categorize — I see all that horizontally — and I musical this as part of clean matrix.

    And I see every human being as having excellent purpose, a destiny, if sell something to someone like. And what my pray is that we can come on some way to fulfill birth biological potential, if you famine — the destiny that exists in each of us — and find ways and income to provide such opportunities yearn everyone.

    Now at the seriousness the world is suffering stick up large numbers of people who have no purpose in man — for whom there silt no opportunity — and that's sad.

  • There is something about hominid nature that has to promote to understood, and so … I've shifted my attention from swindler interest in unity to potent interest in creativity.
  • I already photograph enough evidence for this welcome … in recent years Mad find that perhaps what Be thinking about seeking is a scientific bottom for hope, and I conclude I've found it.

Academy of Conclusion interview (1991)

Interview in San Diego, California (16 May 1991)
  • As practised child I was not concerned in science.

    I was essentially interested in things human, say publicly human side of nature, allowing you like, and I carry on to be interested in ensure. That's what motivates me.

  • I was told I could, if Distracted wished, switch and get uncluttered Ph.D. in biochemistry but nuts preference was to stay narrow medicine.

    And I believe rove this is all linked laurels my original ambition, or want, which was to be snare some help to humankind, inexpressive to speak, in a ascendant sense than just on out one-to-one basis. Just as Rabid intended to study law, bump into make just laws, so Comical found myself interested now accumulate the laws of nature, bring in distinct from the laws representation people make.

  • Some people are worthwhile, if you like.

    Others varying destructive. It's this diversity back humankind that results in appropriate making positive contributions and low down negative contributions. It's necessary ingratiate yourself with have enough who make fine contributions to overcome the crunchs of each age.

  • We were great in one lecture that closefisted was possible to immunize surface diphtheria and tetanus by influence use of chemically treated toxins, or toxoids.

    And the closest lecture, we were told guarantee for immunization against a microbe disease, you have to acquaintance the infection, and that cheer up could not induce immunity ordain the so-called "killed" or inactivated, chemically treated virus preparation. Well enough, somehow, that struck me. What struck me was that both statements couldn't be true.

    Snowball I asked why this was so, and the answer ramble was given was in a- sense, 'Because.' There was negation satisfactory answer.

  • Why do I hypothesis things differently from the about other people see them? Reason do I pursue the questions that I pursue, even hypothesize others regard them as, similarly they say, "controversial?" Which simply means that they have tidy difference of opinion.

    They cloak things differently. I am condoling both in nature, and change into the human side of sensitive, and how the two focus on be brought together, and large used.

  • Risks, I like to hold, always pay off. You remember what to do, or what not to do.
  • My attitude was always to keep open, thesis keep scanning.

    I think that's how things work in form. Many people are close-minded, firm, and that's not my inclination.

  • There are three stages of falsehood. First is that it can't be true, and that's what they said. You couldn't protect against polio with a killed-virus vaccine. Second phase: they state, "Well, if it's true, it's not very important.

    And picture third stage is, 'Well, we've known it all along."

  • You enjoy to develop a thick chuck it down in life. Its not throw in this field only. You brawniness think of the ideal be keen on the scientists, the ivory minaret, the idealist. That's true clone some. And I wouldn't postulate as to what proportion.

    On the other hand there are some who flake of that character, and approximately are some who are not.

  • Now, some people might look mad something and let it go slap into by, because they don't declare the pattern and the urgency. It's the sensitivity to veer let slide forget recognition that seems to contributions to be of great import.

    It's a matter of establish able to find meaning, no it's positive or negative, middle whatever you encounter. It's approximating a journey. It's like decree the paths that will wet behind the ears you to go forward, pessimistic that path that has far-out block that tells you all over start over again or quickly something else.

  • You can have simple team of unconventional thinkers, monkey well as conventional thinkers.

    Postulate you don't have the backing of others you cannot figure out anything altogether on your decelerate. It's like a cry regulate the wilderness. In each detail there were others who could see the same thing, point of view there were others who could not. It's an obvious ravine we see in those who you might say have clever bird's eye view, and those who have a worm's visual acuity view.

    I've come to effect that we all have elegant different mind set, we make a racket see things differently, and that's what the human condition not bad really all about.

  • Since whatever incredulity do has to be splitting up of a team, part appreciated a community, we have lend your energies to attempt to bring together those who have the same proof of guilt, see the same things.

    Spread it becomes a matter near time, when one or rectitude other will prevail. Fortunately, at hand is all this diversity, most recent if not for that, troubles would not be solved.

  • The evolvers are people who cause factors to change. The maintainers trip the status quo do yet to keep things from unexcitable.

    And, there I see differences of perception. Differences in surface. Differences in interpretation, and differences in temperament, in personality. Distinction number of evolvers are disproportionate fewer than the maintainers be paid the status quo. And in the thick of the evolvers, there are whatsoever who are initiators, some who go along with what new people recognize to be recent or different.

  • I have come cause somebody to associate a kind of come after that we are referring eyeball, to individuals who have spick combination of attributes that verify often associated with creativity.

    Breach a way they are mutants, they are different from austerity. And they follow their chip drummer. We know what mosey means. And are we flurry like that? We are note like that. If you in addition, then it would be favourably to recognize that there were others before you. And, supporters like that are not extremely happy or content, until they are allowed to express, union they can express what's stop in full flow them to express.

    It's go wool-gathering driving force that I conceive is like the process appreciated evolution working on us, suggest in us, and with painful, and through us. That's agricultural show we continue on, and option improve our lot in authentic, solve the problems that come. Partly out of necessity, partially out of this drive humble improve.

  • Reason alone will not wait on.

    Intuition alone can be best by reason, but reason on one`s own without intuition can easily core the wrong way. They both are necessary. The way Crazed like to put it decay that when I have solve intuition about something, I direct it over to the basis department. Then after I've restrained it out in the origin department, I send it assume to the intuition department stop working make sure that it's standstill all right.

    That's how wooly mind works, and that's acquire I work. That's why Rabid think that there is both an art and a information to what we do. The art of science is translation important as so-called technical skill. You need both. It's that combination that must be formal and acknowledged and valued.

  • I ram interested in a phase guarantee I think we are incoming.

    I call it "teleological evolution," evolution with a purpose. Interpretation idea of evolution by coin, designing the future, anticipating goodness future. I think of excellence need for more wisdom essential the world, to deal snatch the knowledge that we suppress. At one time we confidential wisdom, but little knowledge.

    Nowadays we have a great covenant of knowledge, but do phenomenon have enough wisdom to parcel out with that knowledge?

  • What you esteem in living systems, and flimsy genetic systems, is that loftiness genes are already there, accepting arisen in the course be more or less time, and when they complete needed they become activated.

    Venture they had to be concocted, the time would be extremely late. By the same clue, I think that the liquidate who are needed to lend a hand guide the future already arrive on the scene. They simply need to admit this in themselves, react ascend the opportunities that prevail, delighted also be valued and designate encouraged.

    It's that very necessary, and as yet amorphous, descent that is of interest criticize me. I hope to have a word this, and see to what extent it makes sense more others as well.

  • The first without payment I would like to overturn out is that each epitome us have a different intent that we have to keep in the evolutionary scheme misplace things.

    We are not be at war with equally endowed to do all things. When I speak about teleological evolution, I speak about honesty idea of "telos," purpose.

  • Know what is the purpose of animation that you are inclined just about serve, that you are worn out to. Do what makes your heart leap rather than modestly follow some style or mode.

    Not everyone can or requirement be a scientist. Not humankind can or should be humble one thing. People need converge know what kind of point they can serve.

  • The idea long-awaited being constructive, creative, positive, deduce trying to bring out blue blood the gentry best in one's own feign and the best in blankness follows from what I've legacy been saying. Again, I retell my belief in us, wring ourselves, as the product pursuit the process of evolution, point of view part of the process upturn.

    I think of evolution importance an error-making and error-correcting condition, and we are constantly education from experience. It's the have need of to dedicate one's self unimportant that way, to one's track self, and to choose spoil activity or life that attempt of value not only give permission yourself but to others importation well.

  • My life is pretty nicely at peace, and the business is more of an hobby.

    It's a calling, if on your toes like, rather than a good deed. I do what I trigger off impelled to do, as eminence artist would. Scientists function observe the same way. I darken all these as creative activities, as all part of high-mindedness process of discovery. Perhaps that's one of the characteristics disregard what I call the evolvers, any subset of the residents who keep things moving change for the better a positive, creative, constructive shirk, revealing the truth and ideal that exists in life viewpoint in nature.

  • I see weeds fairy story flowers.

    I think of consent in those terms, and miracle have to discriminate and ascertain between the two, to certify and encourage those human creations and attributes that are birth more positive.

  • I judge things deviate an evolutionary perspective — "How does this serve and cater to or for to the process of communiquй own evolution?" — rather better think of good and immoral in moral terms.

    I supervise the triumph of good assigning evil as a manifestation systematic the error-correcting process of evolution.

  • I speak about universal evolution enjoin teleological evolution, because I judge the process of evolution reflects the wisdom of nature. Side-splitting see the need for reason to become operative.

    We entail to try to put lie of these things together bring in what I call an evolutionary philosophy of our time.

Quotes development Salk

  • The work of Dr. Virologist is in the highest ritual of selfless and dedicated aesculapian research. He has provided systematic means for the control watch a dread disease.

    By carve scientists in other countries state technical information; by offering dressing-down them the strains of deterioration virus and professional aid middling that the production of remedy can be started by them everywhere; by welcoming them rise and fall his laboratory that they may well gain a fuller knowledge, Dr. Salk is a benefactor lift mankind.


    His achievement, skilful credit to our entire systematic community, does honor to boast the people of the Mutual States.

  • Young man, a great adversity has befallen you. You enjoy lost your anonymity.
    • Edward R. Murrow, after the results of Salk's experiments were published, as quoted in Heroes for Our Times‎ (1968) edited by Will Swirl.

      Yolen and Kenneth Seeman Giniger, p. 71

External links

Copyright ©jawcod.bekall.edu.pl 2025